Sonntag, 28. Oktober 2012

Von den drei Verwandlungen

-->
(Auszüge aus „Also sprach Zarathustra“ von Friedrich Nietzsche)

   DREI Verwandlungen nenne ich euch des Geistes: wie der Geist zum Kamele wird, und zum Löwen das Kamel, und zum Kinde zuletzt der Löwe.
    Vieles Schwere gibt es dem Geiste, dem starken, tragsamen Geiste, dem Ehrfurcht innewohnt: nach dem Schweren und Schwersten verlangt seine Stärke.
    Was ist schwer? so fragt der tragsame Geist, so kniet er nieder, dem Kamele gleich, und will gut beladen sein.
    Was ist das Schwerste, ihr Helden? so fragt der tragsame Geist, dass ich es auf mich nehme und meiner Stärke froh werde.

(--------------------)

    Alles dies Schwere nimmt der tragsame Geist auf sich: dem Kamele gleich, das beladen in die Wüste eilt, also eilt er in seine Wüste.
    Aber in der einsamsten Wüste geschieht die zweite Verwandlung: zum Löwen wird hier der Geist, Freiheit will er sich erbeuten und Herr sein in seiner eigenen Wüste.
    Seinen letzten Herrn sucht er sich hier: Feind will er ihm werden und seinem letzten Gotte, um Sieg will er mit dem grossen Drachen ringen.
    Welches ist der grosse Drache, den der Geist nicht mehr Herr und Gott heissen mag? „Du sollst“ heisst der grosse Drache. Aber der Geist des Löwen sagt „ich will“.

(--------------------)

    „Aller Wert ward schon geschaffen, und aller geschaffene Wert – das bin ich. Wahrlich, es soll kein 'Ich will' mehr geben!“ Also spricht der Drache.
    Meine Brüder, wozu bedarf es des Löwen im Geiste? Was genügt nicht das lastbare Tier, das entsagt und ehrfürchtig ist?
    Neue Werte schaffen – das vermag auch der Löwe noch nicht: aber Freiheit sich schaffen zu neuem Schaffen – das vermag die Macht des Löwen.

(--------------------)

    Als sein Heiligstes liebte er einst das „Du sollst“: nun muss er Wahn und Willkür auch noch im Heiligsten finden, dass er sich Freiheit raube von seiner Liebe: des Löwen bedarf es zu diesem Raube.
    Aber sagt, meine Brüder, was vermag noch das Kind, das auch der Löwe nicht vermochte? Was muss der raubende Löwe auch noch zum Kinde werden?
    Unschuld ist das Kind und Vergessen, ein Neubeginn, ein Spiel, ein aus sich rollendes Rad, eine erste Bewegung, ein heiliges Ja-sagen.
    Ja, zum Spiele des Schaffens, meine Brüder, bedarf es eines heiligen Ja-sagens: seinen Willen will nun der Geist, seine Welt gewinnt sich der Weltverlorene.

   Drei Verwandlungen nannte ich euch des Geistes: wie der Geist zum Kamele ward, und zum Löwen das Kamel, und der Löwe zuletzt zum Kinde.

(---------------------)

Dienstag, 23. Oktober 2012

Integrität + Politik


Um dieses Wort Integrität richtig zu verstehen, muss ich ein englisches Wörterbuch zu Rate ziehen, denn dieses gibt auch die Wurzel des Begriffs integer an, was sehr wichtig sein kann; in diesem Fall nämlich: in (nicht) und tangere (berühren), also unberührt. Ins Deutsche übersetzt komme ich dann auf Ausdrücke wie Ganzheit, Unversehrtheit, und im Duden finde ich noch das Wort Unbestechlichkeit.

Aber was ist Unbestechlichkeit? Es ist neben anderem auch der Mut, das zu sagen, was man selbst beobachtet hat. Jeder Mensch strebt nach dieser Integrität. Er möchte sich selbst sein, ein ganzer Mensch und unversehrt. Und Politiker sind doch auch Menschen, oder nicht? Nur stehen diese fast immer unter einem besonderen Druck.
Man kann ruhig sagen, sie werden in Bezug auf ihr besseres Wissen oft unterdrückt. Zum Beispiel von einer Wirtschaft, die ausschliesslich ihre eigenen ökonomischen Interessen vertritt. Dies ist so gang und gäbe, dass kaum jemand es zu bemerken scheint. Und wenn es dann darauf ankommt, in der Aussenpolitik eine klare Haltung einzunehmen, kommen haufenweise Einwände wie „wir dürfen die USA nicht vergrämen, das ist schlecht für die Wirtschaft;“ oder „die Chinesen könnten ihr Gesicht verlieren und dann ist es aus mit den guten Beziehungen“; oder „die Islamisten sind sehr empfindlich in Bezug auf ihre Religion; man darf sie nicht beleidigen, sonst gibt es Bombenanschläge“; oder „haltet euch zurück mit der Kritik an Israel; wir wollen doch nicht als Antisemiten dastehen“; und so weiter und so fort. Wohin, glauben Sie, führt uns diese Einstellung?

Wenn man ein Problem aus der Welt schaffen will, muss man es zuerst einmal erkennen. Nur jemand mit einer ausgeprägten Integrität ist fähig, zu sehen was da ist. Dazu gehört auch, dass man offen darüber sprechen darf. Ein ansehnlicher Teil der Politiker ist dazu nicht imstande, denn sie geben lieber diesem wahnsinnigen Druck der Wirtschaft und des nationalen Egoismus’ nach, als sich einmal die Zeit zu nehmen, genau hinzuschauen, was da eigentlich abläuft. Sie sind fixiert auf kurzfristige Gewinne in Form von Reichtum und Macht. Und genau in dem Masse sind sie auch mit Blindheit geschlagen. Über die wirklichen Lösungen der sich häufenden internationalen Probleme wird meist nicht einmal gesprochen. Dafür werden alle möglichen Nebengeräusche heiss diskutiert.
 
Jedes beliebige gesunde Kind würde eine vernünftigere Aussenpolitik vorschlagen als die Führer der meisten Nationen unserer Erde dies tun.
Erinnern Sie sich noch an die Märchen-Parabel „Des Königs Kleider“? Die grossen, erwachsenen und „erfahrenen“ Leute sehen nur das, was ihnen eingehämmert worden ist. Einzig das Kind sieht, was da ist, nämlich nichts, keine Kleider, einen nackten König. - Nun, der Unterschied ist der: Ein gesundes Kind ist normalerweise noch unversehrt bezüglich Blindheit und deshalb integer.

Donnerstag, 1. März 2012

Big Bang? - Forget it!


A philosophical speculation



An eternity he had slept. - Slept? - Only a homo sapiens would say so as he cannot imagine eternity, because eternity has no time. It does not last. It is not "long". In eternity there are no subsequent events. It does not move. It is static.
No, "to sleep" was not the right word for it. Nothing could be further from the truth. It was a state of perfect knowledge, a state of sublimity and ecstasy at the same time, but also a state of perfect leisure, a nascent state, his original state. He was sufficient unto himself and knew of no GOOD and EVIL. He knew he could know anything if he wanted to know it - HE who possessed an inexhaustible potential for every possible cause - a potential however, that remained completely unused.
But now he wanted to be active and make an impact in order to enjoy it and at the same time look away from himself. For this he had to assume an identity that matched the game he intended to play. First he created himself a point of view which he occupied. He now WAS the viewpoint. That made his first major, nameless identity. From this viewpoint he created space by demarcating the area with postulated points and thus gave it a definite dimension.
He chose a very ordinary three-dimensional space. Now he had already created something that he could look at, a large, perfectly shaped, spherical space. But now he realized he was alone. And that gave him no joy. He needed company, wanted to go into communication with other beings, wanted to make an impression, to be admired. That was the effect he wanted to achieve. And he thought of something very aesthetic others would certainly like. So he went to work.
First he created a spherical body which radiated a beautiful, bright yellow light, then, within a reasonable distance, a second one in the color blue, which now was shone by the first one on one side and thus lit up green there. Then he created a third one in the color red, which then was orange-blazed on one side. He looked at his creation and it was great - just perfect. He could make it appear and disappear at will and was now very happy that he had something to look at. But now he wanted to show his work to another being.
"Hello, is somebody there?" he thought, let it flow out as a pure question of expectations and was surprised that he immediately got a response.
"Clearly there is someone! What do you think it would be just you alone? "
"No, no, I'm glad that you exist! Look, I've made something very beautiful. Do you like it? "
"Well, yes .... seems to be all right ... It just looks to me .... a little too easy! Are you really such a simple creature or was it intentional? "
That was enough for him to be silenced. He withdrew and let his work disappear by simply no longer creating it. He felt slightly upset. "I'll show them though. I'm not simple," he thought, and immediately started with something new.
Now he expanded his space into the nearly immeasurable, put a sun in it, then a second, third one and so on, and let them circulate at proper distance to each other on different orbits around a common center. The center was empty. He himself was the center. He added a few satellites to each sun, which thus received their own centers. And he created an increasing number of such systems. In a frantic pace he doubled, multiplied them at a huge number until they, viewed from a different point of view, were hardly to recognize in detail or as only little more than points in a fog. The structure, considered now as a whole, assumed the form of a disk-like galaxy. Now he was highly pleased with himself and happy. No one should say anymore he was simple!
But now he had a problem. His work was not simply existing on its own. He had to re-create it at every moment, so that he could look at it. However he wanted that it remained there without having constantly to maintain control over it. He had to invent something that caused that his creation retained its shape and function.
Having thus equipped his universe with a galaxy, it was necessary to forget that HE HIMSELF had created it, and this in turn presupposed an abrupt abandonment of his omniscience. An at least partial ignorance was now essential that his universe remained existing, because if he now had taken over full responsibility for its creation, this would have been the end of it. He even had to imagine someone else had caused all this, because that was one of the possible conditions that could set the time and thus survival.
Had not the other being prompted him to create something that he could no longer control? Yes ... so it must have been! The other one had caused this and was therefore responsible for it.
And so the first big lie found its way into his world. For the absolute truth was quite simple: FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR HIS OWN CREATION, and that would turn a NOTHINGNESS - in other words: the total absence of matter, energy, space and time - and HE HIMSELF as an unlimited potential!
But he had made his decision. He wanted to HAVE something. And indeed, he had made it! Now he possessed something that seemed to exist for itself alone, without having to manage the process, a perpetual motion machine, a mechanism that automatically ran. But the price was ignorance. He had to pretend he did not know better. And so began his downfall.







An immense time span lay in between since then. - But this again is expressed quite wrong, because he owned his own universe. His concept of time was as individual as that of those beings with which he had contact. He himself had time absolutely under control. There were sometimes small changes in his universe, that took "half an eternity" if he wanted it that way, and on the other hand, big circulations which claimed hardly a moment. - His universe had assumed the form of a spiral galaxy in the meantime.
There was now a lively exchange between all the different viewpoints, or better said, the beings who revealed their own taste of creativity. He had borrowed from other universes interesting things and new ideas by simply duplicating them in his own world. There were huge clusters in bizarre shapes, binary star systems, gas giants and much more what makes up a universe. No one would now dare to call him "simple". In fact the complications became more and more complex and the malice now existed rather in the difficulty of keeping track.
And time arrived when these created forms became more and more solid, due to the constant communication between the beings involved. The first clashes of worlds happened and a great confusion arose over the question of who owned what. An increasing number of collisions took place and at a precise sorting out of responibilities was little more thought. An erasing of single individual worlds seemed to be no longer possible. For all beings this became now a big problem because they were barely able to change their own creations without the consent of the other creatures. The interdependence gave them a very bad puzzle to solve. And finally they were struck with this all-important question: What shall we do with this universe?
The only plausible answer to this question was now obvious: a common universe had to be defined and upheld. This included agreement on laws and function, and a collective understanding of time. Gradually it became clear that the most common opinions and postulates about how a universe should behave prevailed. Newton's laws of gravity, the inertia of mass, conservation of energy, etc. were born and stabilized, i.e. agreed upon.
The common understanding of time was determined by the average vibration of atoms of matter in this now called the physical universe. That vibration was felt throughout the universe and became a sing-song or "hit" for all the beings who were involved. Thus a common time was enforced that would be representative of all times. The individual time then was assessed by the changes of position of particles, i.e. stars, planets etc. The universe grew to an ever-expanding universe because it contained the law of conservation of energy.
Now there were quite a few beings - although a minority - who did not agree. They were of the opinion that the laws of this universe were extremely restrictive, stupid and materialistic and would sooner or later lead to the fact that the physical universe turned into a maze and thus would become a dangerous trap for all beings, who identified themselves with it. They were the nonconformists of creation. They revolted against it, split off and joined forces to form a group to create a separate universe they also could use together, but which left them at the same time full liberty to retain their own individual points of view.

Thus a parallel universe developed – or more accurately, one that was lying outside the physical universe – which was similar to it in some respects, but was defined differently in terms of function and structure. Particularly lacking in this separate world was that fatal law which resulted in an expanding universe, namely the conservation of energy. But all other laws could also be amended or repealed. This superior world should later in the course of time become the very ground for all major philosophies and religions in the physical universe, because the beings trapped in there lost their natural abilities, became weaker and weaker and needed the longer the more urgent help.
And indeed, in the ensuing eons the physical universe went through a fatal development. The more beings were entangled in it and the bigger it got, the more solid was its matter. The laws of physics were fully applied and worked out to be chaotic. Galaxies collided, huge suns exploded and created giant solar nebulas and new planets, which in turn formed new systems. The physical universe developed a life of its own, a self-running system that was out of control. It was a vast labyrinth of masses and energies, in which the spiritual beings were less and less able to orient themselves. They lost their spiritual orientation points and were becoming increasingly dependent on shapes and objects in order to align themselves accordingly.

The greater this dependency became, the more they tended to see themselves as a part of masses and energies. In other words, a spiritual being was overwhelmed to the degree by the physical universe as he agreed with it and considered it as the true reality and truth. And with that his intellectual potential and consciousness became more and more restricted.

Over the millions of years, some planets cooled off enough so that they were ready to receive life in the form of primitive organisms. This rudimentary organic life was first created by the spiritual beings who were trapped in this universe. They sacrificed, so to speak, a part of themselves to endow matter with life energy. This life energy, to some extent mixed with a suitable material, was the start of the protoplasm lines, which first consisted only of very primitive single-celled organisms. The protoplasm followed a certain cycle, namely conception, birth, procreation and thus developed through millions of years of evolution to ever higher – i.e. larger and more complex – organisms which in turn continued, completed and perfected their genetic lines.

The beings in the physical universe had no other choice than to start a large-scale life-cycle that would allow them in the distant future to be able to take over adequate and appropriate bodies and by the help of them - and that was their only hope - once again be able to be cause over matter, energy, space and time.

They had to ensure from now on that the stream of life did not dry up. And thus the two factors GOOD and EVIL came into play. Good was everything that helped life in general to go on, evil was everthing that destroyed life or disabled its progress. A duality was created. The smallest unit of anything that concerned the organic life was TWO: good and evil, right and wrong, beautiful and ugly, etc.

But there were many beings who did not want to wait that long until appropriate bodies were available. They wanted to play the game of life, no matter what the cost, and adopted without considering the consequences animal bodies. The other ones, not yet that degenerated and still capable of being cause over matter, energy, space and time up to a certain degree, better waited until the evolution had proceeded far enough to produce human-like bodies. They were the ones who promoted the evolution and made sure that a diversity of species came into being and that the development followed a certain direction. They created the different races according to their own special taste.

LIFE ITSELF, though trapped in this universe, but provided with its inherent, inextinguishable longing for immortality, had no choice but to accept the challenge in one way or another. The game of life had been given a new name and a supposedly new function. The reconquest of the physical universe had begun and was in full swing. To survive was now the order of the day.


Mittwoch, 8. Februar 2012

Diogenes (Übernommen aus Wikipedia)

DIOGENES THE WISE MAN

AT Corinth, in Greece, there lived a very wise man whose name was Diogenes. Men came from all parts of the land to see him and hear him talk.
But wise as he was, he had some very queer ways. He did not believe that any man ought to have more things than he really needed; and he said that no man needed much. And so he did not live in a house, but slept in a tub or barrel, which he rolled about from place to place. He spent his days sitting in the sun, and saying wise things to those who were around him.
At noon one day, Diogenes was seen walking through the streets with a lighted lantern, and looking all around as if in search of something.
"Why do you carry a lantern when the sun is shining?" some one said.
"I am looking for an honest man," answered Diogenes.
When Alexander the Great went to Corinth, all the foremost men in the city came out to see him and to praise him. But Diogenes did not come; and he was the only man for whose opinions Alexander cared.
And so, since the wise man wonld not come to see the king, the king went to see the wise man. He found Diogenes in an out-of-the-way place, lying on the ground by his tub. He was enjoying the heat and the light of the sun.



Diogenes and Alexander



When he saw the king and a great many people coming, he sat up and looked at Alexander. Alexander greeted him and said,
"Diogenes, I have heard a great deal about your wisdom. Is there anything that I can do for you?"
"Yes," said Diogenes. "You can stand a little on one side, so as not to keep the sunshine from me."
This answer was so different from what he expected, that the king was much surprised. But it did not make him angry; it only made him admire the strange man all the more. When he turned to ride back, he said to his officers,
"Say what you will; if I were not Alexander, I would like to be Diogenes."

Sonntag, 29. Januar 2012

Verlust einer Liebe


die Leitung ist tot
das Kabel gerissen
doch auch in der Not
brauchst du bloss zu wissen

dass dein Nächster da ist
für dich und für jeden
wenn du nur nicht vergisst:
du selbst bist das Leben